Clergy Abuse Charges in Colorado

Clergy abuse allegations in Colorado can involve claims that a pastor, priest, minister, rabbi, imam, religious teacher, youth leader, church staff member, spiritual advisor, or other religious leader used a position of spiritual authority to abuse, exploit, manipulate, threaten, groom, or sexually mistreat another person. These cases may involve children, teenagers, adult congregants, counseling relationships, religious-school settings, youth groups, camps, retreats, private meetings, confessional communications, spiritual counseling, or church-related activities.

Colorado does not have one single criminal statute for clergy abuse. Instead, allegations against clergy or religious leaders are usually prosecuted under other Colorado criminal statutes depending on the facts. If the alleged victim is a child, prosecutors may consider sexual assault on a child by one in a position of trust under C.R.S. § 18-3-405.3, child abuse under C.R.S. § 18-6-401, sexual exploitation of a child, unlawful sexual contact, internet luring, enticement, harassment, stalking, or other charges. If the alleged victim is an adult, prosecutors may consider sexual assault, unlawful sexual contact, harassment, stalking, extortion, criminal invasion of privacy, domestic violence-related charges, or other offenses depending on the alleged conduct.

These cases are extremely serious because they often combine criminal allegations, religious authority, community pressure, family conflict, mandatory reporting issues, child welfare investigations, institutional investigations, and intense reputational damage. A clergy abuse accusation can threaten freedom, employment, ordination, professional licensing, immigration status, family relationships, church membership, and public reputation before the case is ever proven in court. Because of those stakes, the defense must carefully examine the actual criminal charge, the alleged relationship, the age of the alleged victim, the claimed position of trust, the communications, the timing, and whether the prosecution can prove every required element beyond a reasonable doubt.

Colorado Clergy Abuse Defense Attorney

Clergy abuse allegations are often emotionally powerful and publicly damaging. Once an accusation is made, investigators, religious institutions, congregants, family members, media, or community members may assume guilt before the evidence has been tested. In some cases, the allegation may involve serious abuse. In others, it may involve misunderstanding, adult relationship conflict, false accusations, family disputes, church politics, disciplinary disputes, custody conflict, selective screenshots, or allegations that do not fit the criminal statute charged.

At the Law Office of Matthew A. Martin, P.C., we understand that clergy abuse cases require careful, discreet, and detailed defense work. Matthew Martin examines the actual charge, the claimed position of trust, the age and status of the alleged victim, communications, counseling records, church records, youth-program records, travel or retreat details, digital evidence, witness statements, mandatory-reporting issues, and whether law enforcement or church investigators overreached. We fight to protect our clients from unsupported accusations, exaggerated claims, unconstitutional investigations, and life-changing criminal consequences.

If you or someone you love has been accused of clergy abuse, sexual misconduct by a religious leader, or a related offense in Colorado, call (303) 725-0017 to schedule your free consultation today.

Overview of Clergy Abuse in Colorado

Back to top

Definition of Clergy Abuse Allegations Under Colorado Law

“Clergy abuse” is a broad phrase rather than a single Colorado criminal offense. It may refer to sexual abuse, sexual exploitation, physical abuse, emotional manipulation, spiritual coercion, grooming, harassment, stalking, financial exploitation, threats, or failure to report abuse by a member of the clergy or another religious leader. The criminal charge depends on the specific conduct alleged.

If the accusation involves a minor, prosecutors often focus on whether the religious leader was in a position of trust. Under Colorado law, sexual assault on a child by one in a position of trust applies when a person knowingly subjects a child under 18 to sexual contact and the actor is in a position of trust with respect to the child. A religious leader may be accused of being in a position of trust if they were responsible for the child’s supervision, welfare, education, religious instruction, youth-program participation, counseling, or care.

If the accusation involves an adult, the case may be charged differently. Colorado does not generally make every sexual relationship between clergy and an adult congregant a crime simply because of the religious relationship. However, criminal charges may be filed if prosecutors allege lack of consent, coercion, force, threats, intoxication, incapacity, harassment, stalking, extortion, unlawful sexual contact, or another criminal element. If the clergy member was also acting as a psychotherapist or mental health provider, additional statutes may become relevant.

Back to top

Common Situations Leading to Clergy Abuse Charges

Youth Ministry Allegations — These cases may involve pastors, youth ministers, religious-school teachers, camp leaders, volunteers, or church staff accused of sexual contact, grooming, inappropriate messaging, private meetings, or boundary violations involving minors. Prosecutors may argue that the religious leader had authority, trust, or supervision over the child.

Religious School or Church Program Cases — Allegations may arise from Sunday school, religious education, private schools, choir, retreats, mission trips, camps, confirmation classes, youth groups, or after-school church activities. These cases often involve questions about supervision, access, institutional policies, parent permission, and who was responsible for the child at the relevant time.

Spiritual Counseling Allegations — Some cases involve private counseling or pastoral care. An adult or minor may allege that a clergy member used spiritual advice, confession, prayer, counseling, or religious authority to exploit vulnerability or obtain sexual access. The defense may need to examine whether the interaction was religious counseling, mental health treatment, consensual adult conduct, or something else under Colorado law.

Adult Congregant Relationship Allegations — A consensual adult relationship may later become the subject of a criminal complaint if one person claims coercion, manipulation, threats, intoxication, incapacity, harassment, stalking, or nonconsensual contact. The defense must separate moral, religious, employment, or institutional misconduct issues from actual criminal elements.

Mandatory Reporting Investigations — Clergy members are included among Colorado mandatory reporters for suspected child abuse or neglect, subject to important privilege rules for certain confidential religious communications. A criminal issue may arise if prosecutors allege that a clergy member willfully failed to report suspected abuse when legally required to do so.

Church Discipline or Institutional Investigations — Allegations may begin inside a church, diocese, synagogue, mosque, religious school, denominational board, or internal disciplinary body before law enforcement becomes involved. Statements made in an internal investigation can later become evidence in a criminal case.

Digital Communication Cases — Text messages, direct messages, emails, social media communications, church-app messages, video calls, and deleted communications often play a central role in clergy abuse allegations. Prosecutors may characterize messages as grooming, secrecy, threats, or solicitation. The defense may argue that messages were taken out of context, incomplete, misinterpreted, or not criminal.

Family, Custody, or Community Conflict — Some accusations arise in the middle of family conflict, divorce, custody disputes, church leadership disputes, employment termination, congregation splits, or personal retaliation. The defense may investigate motive, timing, prior inconsistent statements, and whether the accusation is being used to gain leverage.

Back to top

Clergy, Religious Leaders, and Position-of-Trust Allegations

In child-related clergy abuse cases, the position-of-trust issue can be central. Colorado law defines a person in a position of trust broadly. It can include a person responsible for a child’s health, education, welfare, or supervision, even briefly, and even through another person or institution. This broad definition means prosecutors may argue that a clergy member, youth leader, religious teacher, camp counselor, or church volunteer occupied a position of trust if they had supervisory responsibility over the child.

The defense should not assume that the title “clergy” automatically proves the statutory position-of-trust element. The prosecution must prove the actual relationship and responsibility at the time of the alleged act. A person may be a religious leader generally but not have supervision, care, or authority over a particular child in the way the statute requires. The defense may examine church records, role descriptions, volunteer policies, parent permission forms, event schedules, witness statements, supervision practices, and whether the accused person was actually responsible for the child’s welfare or supervision.

The position-of-trust issue can also affect how prosecutors, judges, and jurors view the case. Allegations involving spiritual authority can create strong emotional reactions. A defense attorney must keep the case focused on the statutory elements, the actual evidence, and the prosecution’s burden of proof.

Back to top

Child Sexual Abuse Allegations Involving Clergy

When the alleged victim is under 18, prosecutors may consider several serious child sex offense charges. The most common clergy-related charge may be sexual assault on a child by one in a position of trust under C.R.S. § 18-3-405.3. That statute applies to sexual contact with a child under 18 by someone who is in a position of trust with respect to the child. If the child is under 15, or if the offense is alleged to be part of a pattern of sexual abuse, the charge is a class 3 felony. If the child is 15, 16, or 17 and there is no alleged pattern of sexual abuse, the charge is a class 4 felony.

Other charges may also be considered depending on the facts. These may include sexual assault on a child, sexual assault, unlawful sexual contact, sexual exploitation of a child, internet luring, enticement of a child, child abuse, contributing to the delinquency of a minor, obscenity-related offenses, harassment, stalking, or criminal invasion of privacy. If the allegation involves images, videos, explicit messages, or online contact, digital-evidence charges may become part of the case.

Consent is often misunderstood in these cases. Even if a teenager is above Colorado’s general age of consent, a person in a position of trust may still face criminal liability for sexual contact with a minor under 18. The defense must examine the child’s age, the alleged contact, the accused person’s role, the relationship between the parties, the timing, and whether the prosecution can prove every statutory requirement.

Back to top

Adult Congregant and Spiritual Counseling Allegations

Adult clergy abuse allegations may involve claims that a religious leader exploited a congregant’s emotional vulnerability, spiritual dependence, grief, marital conflict, trauma, addiction recovery, or need for religious guidance. These allegations can be serious and may have major institutional, employment, religious, and reputational consequences. But the criminal charge depends on the specific conduct alleged.

In Colorado, an adult relationship with a clergy member is not automatically a criminal offense solely because one person was a religious leader. Prosecutors generally need a criminal element such as lack of consent, force, threats, coercion, incapacity, intoxication, unlawful sexual contact, harassment, stalking, extortion, criminal invasion of privacy, or another offense. If the clergy member was also acting as a psychotherapist, counselor, or mental health provider, sexual assault on a client by a psychotherapist may also need to be considered.

The defense in adult cases often focuses on the difference between criminal conduct, unethical conduct, religious misconduct, workplace violations, and consensual adult conduct. A person may face discipline from a church, denomination, employer, licensing body, or community even when the facts do not satisfy a criminal statute. A criminal defense attorney must prevent noncriminal moral judgment from replacing the legal burden of proof.

Back to top

Mandatory Reporting and Clergy Privilege Issues

Colorado law includes clergy members among the professionals who may be required to report suspected child abuse or neglect. A clergy member may have a duty to report when they have reasonable cause to know or suspect that a child has been subjected to abuse or neglect, or when they observe conditions that would reasonably result in abuse or neglect. Reports are generally made to the county department, local law enforcement, or the child abuse reporting hotline system.

However, Colorado law also includes an important exception tied to confidential religious communications. The clergy mandatory-reporting provision does not apply when the clergy member learns of the suspected abuse or neglect through a communication about which the clergy member may not be examined as a witness under Colorado’s clergy privilege, unless the clergy member also learns the information from another source.

This issue can be legally complicated. A statement made in confession, pastoral counseling, private spiritual guidance, church discipline, a youth meeting, or a staff report may not all be treated the same way. The defense may need to examine how the information was received, whether it was confidential, whether the clergy privilege applies, whether the information also came from another source, and whether the prosecution can prove a willful failure to report. A person accused of failing to report should not assume that every clergy communication is privileged or that every church-related conversation creates a reporting duty.

Back to top

Digital Communications, Grooming Allegations, and Church Records

Digital evidence is often central in clergy abuse cases. Investigators may collect text messages, emails, social media messages, church-app communications, phone records, deleted messages, photos, videos, cloud data, location data, and call logs. Prosecutors may argue that private messages show grooming, secrecy, boundary violations, requests for sexual contact, threats, manipulation, or attempts to isolate the alleged victim.

The defense must review the complete record, not just selected screenshots. Messages may be edited, incomplete, taken out of context, misdated, misattributed, or misunderstood. A single message may sound damaging when isolated but look different when reviewed with the full conversation, prior relationship, group-chat context, church role, or surrounding events.

Church and institutional records may also matter. These may include volunteer files, training materials, policies, event schedules, counseling records, sign-in sheets, building access logs, emails, complaint records, disciplinary records, youth-group documents, and internal investigation notes. The defense must determine what records exist, whether they support or contradict the accusation, and whether investigators selectively relied on only some of the evidence.

Back to top

Penalties for Clergy Abuse Related Charges in Colorado

The penalties depend on the exact charge. Because “clergy abuse” is not a single criminal offense, the possible sentence may range from a misdemeanor penalty to felony prison exposure and lifetime sex offender consequences.

Sexual Assault on a Child by One in a Position of Trust — If the alleged victim is 15, 16, or 17 and the offense is not alleged as part of a pattern of sexual abuse, the charge is a class 4 felony. A class 4 felony generally carries 2 to 6 years in prison, a fine of $2,000 to $500,000, and 3 years of mandatory parole. If the alleged victim is under 15, or if the offense is alleged as part of a pattern of sexual abuse, the charge is a class 3 felony. A class 3 felony generally carries 4 to 12 years in prison, a fine of $3,000 to $750,000, and 3 years of mandatory parole. Sex offense sentencing rules may create indeterminate sentencing exposure and sex offender supervision consequences.

Sexual Assault or Unlawful Sexual Contact — If the allegation involves an adult or a child but is not charged under the position-of-trust statute, prosecutors may file sexual assault or unlawful sexual contact charges. The classification and penalty depend on the alleged conduct, force, threats, consent issues, age, relationship, injuries, and other aggravating facts. Some sexual assault charges are felonies with prison exposure, indeterminate sentencing issues, and sex offender registration.

Child Abuse — If the accusation involves physical abuse, neglect, endangerment, or placing a child in a threatening situation, child abuse charges under C.R.S. § 18-6-401 may apply. Penalties depend on injury, death, risk, and mental state. Child abuse can be a misdemeanor or a serious felony.

Failure to Report Child Abuse — A willful violation of Colorado’s mandatory-reporting statute is a class 2 misdemeanor. For offenses committed on or after March 1, 2022, a class 2 misdemeanor generally carries up to 120 days in jail, a fine of up to $750, or both. The statute also provides for civil liability for damages proximately caused by the failure to report.

Harassment, Stalking, or Threat-Related Charges — If the case involves repeated messages, unwanted contact, threats, intimidation, or surveillance, prosecutors may file harassment or stalking charges. Harassment is often a misdemeanor, while stalking can be a felony and may carry protection-order consequences.

Sexual Exploitation, Images, or Online Conduct — If prosecutors allege child sexual abuse material, explicit images, unlawful sexual communications, internet luring, enticement, or online exploitation, the penalties may be extremely severe. These cases can carry felony prison exposure, sex offender registration, and major collateral consequences.

Related Charges Can Increase the Exposure — Clergy abuse allegations may involve multiple counts, multiple alleged victims, multiple dates, pattern allegations, protection-order violations, computer crime, tampering, witness intimidation, or obstruction. The total exposure may be far greater than the lead charge alone.

Back to top

Sex Offender Registration and Collateral Consequences

Many clergy abuse-related convictions can require sex offender registration in Colorado. Registration may include initial registration, periodic re-registration, address reporting, employment reporting, school reporting, travel-related issues, public-record consequences, and restrictions that can affect housing, employment, and community life. The exact registration requirement depends on the conviction and sentence.

The collateral consequences can be severe even before conviction. A clergy member or religious leader may be removed from ministry, suspended by a church or denomination, barred from contact with minors, publicly named, terminated, sued, investigated internally, or excluded from religious work. The accusation may affect family relationships, housing, employment, immigration status, professional licensing, volunteer eligibility, and public reputation.

If the accused person works with children, schools, nonprofits, counseling ministries, hospitals, prisons, youth camps, or religious education programs, the professional consequences may be immediate. A defense strategy must account for both the criminal case and the institutional fallout.

Back to top

Defenses to Clergy Abuse Charges

No Position of Trust — In a child position-of-trust case, the prosecution must prove that the accused person was in a position of trust with respect to the alleged victim. A religious title alone may not be enough. The defense may challenge whether the accused actually had responsibility for the child’s health, education, welfare, or supervision at the relevant time.

No Sexual Contact or Criminal Conduct — The defense may directly challenge whether the alleged conduct occurred. These cases may involve delayed reporting, inconsistent statements, lack of physical evidence, unreliable memories, false accusations, or claims that changed over time.

Conduct Was Not Criminal Under the Charged Statute — Some allegations may describe unethical, inappropriate, or institutionally prohibited conduct but not satisfy the criminal statute charged. The defense must separate religious discipline issues from criminal proof.

False Accusation or Motive to Fabricate — Clergy abuse accusations may arise from family disputes, church politics, employment conflict, custody disputes, romantic conflict, retaliation, or misunderstanding. The defense may investigate motive, timing, prior statements, and contradictory evidence.

Consent Issues in Adult Cases — In adult cases, consent may be central depending on the charge. The defense may examine the relationship, communications, context, intoxication claims, force allegations, threats, and whether the prosecution can prove lack of consent beyond a reasonable doubt.

Age or Knowledge Issues — In some cases, the alleged victim’s age or the accused person’s knowledge of age may matter depending on the charge. The defense may examine records, communications, representations, and the circumstances of the relationship.

Digital Evidence Problems — Screenshots can be incomplete, altered, selectively presented, or taken out of context. A defense attorney may examine metadata, full message threads, device extractions, cloud backups, deleted messages, and authenticity.

Clergy Privilege and Reporting Defenses — In failure-to-report cases, the defense may analyze whether the information came through a privileged clergy communication, whether the clergy member learned it from another source, and whether any failure to report was willful.

Illegal Search or Seizure — Police may search phones, computers, church offices, homes, vehicles, email accounts, cloud storage, or institutional records. If law enforcement violated constitutional protections, the defense may seek suppression.

Improper Interview or Suggestive Questioning — In child cases, forensic interviews must be carefully reviewed. Suggestive questioning, repeated interviews, coaching, family pressure, or contamination of memory may create reasonable doubt.

Insufficient Evidence — The prosecution must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt. Community anger, institutional discipline, religious disapproval, or public suspicion cannot substitute for proof.

Back to top

Role of a Colorado Criminal Defense Attorney

Identifying the Actual Charge — Because “clergy abuse” is not a single statute, the defense begins by identifying the exact criminal charge and elements the prosecution must prove. The strategy depends on whether the case involves a child, adult, position-of-trust claim, sexual assault, failure to report, harassment, exploitation, or another offense.

Reviewing the Relationship and Role — A defense attorney examines the accused person’s actual role, duties, authority, supervision responsibilities, counseling relationship, and contact with the alleged victim. This is especially important when prosecutors rely on position-of-trust allegations.

Analyzing Digital Evidence — Matthew Martin reviews complete message threads, emails, social media records, church communications, phone data, photographs, videos, metadata, and whether digital evidence was lawfully obtained and accurately preserved.

Examining Church and Institutional Records — Church records may support or undermine the accusation. Defense counsel may review volunteer files, training policies, youth-program records, counseling logs, complaint histories, internal investigation documents, and event schedules.

Protecting Against One-Sided Investigations — Religious institutions may conduct internal investigations before police are involved. A defense attorney helps protect the client from making statements that may later be used in criminal court and ensures that investigators do not rely on incomplete or biased information.

Challenging Forensic Interviews and Witness Statements — In child cases, the defense may examine forensic interview methods, prior disclosures, parent or family influence, repeated questioning, inconsistencies, and whether the statements are reliable.

Handling Mandatory Reporting Issues — If failure to report is alleged, defense counsel reviews the reporting statute, the privilege exception, the source of the information, the timing, and whether any failure was willful.

Negotiating Reduced Charges or Dismissal — In some cases, the evidence may not support the charge, and dismissal may be appropriate. In others, defense counsel may seek reduced charges, carefully structured pleas, deferred outcomes where legally available, or resolutions that limit long-term damage.

Trial Representation in Sensitive Cases — If the case proceeds to trial, the defense attorney must carefully cross-examine witnesses, challenge assumptions, explain legal elements, address emotional bias, and keep the jury focused on proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

Back to top

Key Elements the Prosecution Must Prove

The elements depend on the exact charge filed. In a clergy-related sexual assault on a child by one in a position of trust case, the prosecution must generally prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:

  • the alleged victim was under 18;
  • the defendant knowingly subjected the alleged victim to sexual contact;
  • the alleged victim was not the defendant’s spouse;
  • the defendant was in a position of trust with respect to the alleged victim at the time of the alleged conduct;
  • the conduct occurred in Colorado at or about the date and place charged; and
  • any aggravating facts, such as the child being under 15 or a pattern of sexual abuse, if charged.

In an adult clergy abuse-related sexual assault or unlawful sexual contact case, the prosecution must prove the elements of the specific offense charged, which may include lack of consent, force, threats, incapacity, sexual contact, sexual intrusion, sexual penetration, or other statutory requirements.

In a failure-to-report case, the prosecution must generally prove that the accused person was a mandatory reporter, had reasonable cause to know or suspect reportable child abuse or neglect, was legally required to report, did not fall within a statutory exception, and willfully failed to make the required report.

If the prosecution cannot prove the required elements of the specific charge, the defendant cannot be convicted simply because the accusation involves clergy, religion, or moral wrongdoing.

Back to top

Frequently Asked Questions

Is clergy abuse a separate crime in Colorado?
Not usually under that title. Colorado generally prosecutes clergy abuse allegations under other criminal statutes, such as sexual assault on a child by one in a position of trust, sexual assault, unlawful sexual contact, child abuse, harassment, stalking, sexual exploitation, or failure to report.

Can a pastor, priest, minister, rabbi, imam, or religious leader be considered in a position of trust?
Potentially yes. If the person had responsibility for a child’s health, education, welfare, or supervision, prosecutors may argue that the person was in a position of trust. The defense may challenge whether that relationship actually existed with the specific child.

Is it illegal for clergy to have a sexual relationship with an adult congregant?
Not automatically under Colorado criminal law. It may violate religious, ethical, employment, or institutional rules, but a criminal charge generally requires proof of a specific offense, such as lack of consent, coercion, threats, unlawful contact, harassment, stalking, or another criminal element.

What if the clergy member was also providing counseling?
If the clergy member was acting as a psychotherapist or mental health provider, additional legal issues may arise. Colorado has a separate statute involving sexual assault on a client by a psychotherapist. Whether that statute applies depends on the facts and the role the person was performing.

Are clergy members mandatory reporters in Colorado?
Yes, clergy members are listed as mandatory reporters for suspected child abuse or neglect, but Colorado law includes an exception for certain privileged clergy communications unless the clergy member also learns the information from another source.

Can a church investigation affect the criminal case?
Yes. Statements made during an internal church investigation, disciplinary process, or employment review may later be used by law enforcement or prosecutors. Anyone accused should be cautious before giving statements.

Can old allegations still be prosecuted?
Possibly. Sex offenses, especially offenses involving children, may have extended or special limitations rules. The answer depends on the offense, the date of the alleged conduct, the alleged victim’s age, and changes in Colorado law.

Can digital messages be used as evidence?
Yes. Text messages, emails, social media messages, church-app communications, photos, and videos may be used as evidence. The defense may challenge authenticity, context, completeness, and legality of the search.

Does a conviction require sex offender registration?
Many sex offense convictions involving clergy abuse allegations can require sex offender registration. The exact requirement depends on the conviction and sentence.

Can these charges be defended if the accusation is false?
Yes. The defense may challenge the facts, the alleged relationship, the position-of-trust element, witness credibility, digital evidence, forensic interviews, improper investigation methods, and whether the prosecution can prove the charge beyond a reasonable doubt.

Back to top

Additional Resources

Colorado Revised Statutes § 18-3-405.3 – Sexual Assault on a Child by One in a Position of Trust — This statute is often central in clergy-related child sexual abuse cases when prosecutors allege that a religious leader or church worker had supervisory or welfare-related authority over a minor.

Colorado Revised Statutes § 18-3-402 – Sexual Assault — This statute may be relevant when the alleged victim is an adult or when prosecutors allege sexual penetration or intrusion under circumstances involving lack of consent, force, threats, incapacity, or other statutory grounds.

Colorado Revised Statutes § 19-3-304 – Persons Required to Report Child Abuse or Neglect — This statute lists mandatory reporters, including clergy members, and contains the clergy-communication exception tied to privileged communications.

Colorado Revised Statutes § 13-90-107 – Clergy Privilege — This statute may be relevant when the case involves confidential communications made to clergy in a professional religious capacity.

Back to top

Finding a Colorado Clergy Abuse Defense Attorney

Clergy abuse allegations in Colorado are serious, sensitive, and highly damaging. These cases may involve sex offense charges, child abuse allegations, position-of-trust issues, mandatory reporting questions, church investigations, digital evidence, child welfare proceedings, public stigma, and severe collateral consequences. They require a defense attorney who can separate moral accusation, institutional discipline, and community pressure from the actual elements of the criminal charge.

At the Law Office of Matthew A. Martin, P.C., we defend clients facing clergy abuse allegations, sex offense charges, child abuse charges, failure-to-report allegations, harassment, stalking, and related criminal matters throughout Colorado. We investigate the facts, challenge weak evidence, review digital and institutional records, protect constitutional rights, and fight to reduce the risk of wrongful conviction and life-changing consequences.

If you are facing clergy abuse or religious-leader misconduct charges in Colorado, call (303) 725-0017 today to schedule your free consultation.

Avvo Rating
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Colorado Criminal Defense Bar
National College for DUI Defense
Better Business Bureau