Law Enforcement Officers Charged with DUI in Colorado

A DUI charge can create serious consequences for a Colorado law enforcement officer that go well beyond the criminal court and the loss of driving privileges. In addition to jail, fines, probation, useful public service, alcohol or drug treatment, ignition-interlock requirements, and DMV revocation, an officer may face an internal affairs investigation, administrative leave, departmental discipline, restrictions on carrying a firearm or operating an agency vehicle, credibility issues in pending criminal cases, loss of specialized assignments, and possible employment consequences.

Colorado peace officers also operate under the state’s Peace Officer Standards and Training system, commonly known as POST. Colorado POST manages certification and training for active and reserve peace officers working for law enforcement agencies throughout the state. A DUI does not automatically mean that POST certification will be revoked, but an officer’s criminal case may still intersect with POST requirements, agency reporting, employment records, and future hiring or transfer decisions.

For law enforcement officers, the professional consequences may depend heavily on details that would have little relevance in an ordinary DUI case. Whether the officer was carrying a firearm, operating a department vehicle, attempted to invoke professional status, was disrespectful to investigating officers, tried to avoid arrest, caused a crash, or had a prior DUI can significantly affect internal discipline even when those facts do not alter the basic DUI charge itself. Denver Police Department’s disciplinary guidance, for example, expressly identifies several of these circumstances as potentially aggravating factors when an officer is accused of DUI or DWAI.

Denver DUI Defense Attorney for Law Enforcement Officers

A law enforcement officer charged with DUI needs a defense strategy that recognizes the criminal case may be only one part of the problem. The same police report, body-camera footage, chemical test, refusal allegation, or statement used by prosecutors may also be reviewed by internal affairs, command staff, civil service authorities, POST, prosecutors concerned about officer credibility, and future law enforcement employers.

At the Law Office of Matthew A. Martin, P.C., we understand that officers accused of DUI may face professional consequences even before the criminal case reaches a final disposition. Matthew Martin carefully examines the stop, arrest, field sobriety tests, blood or breath evidence, body-camera footage, chemical-testing procedures, DMV action, and any alleged conduct that an employing agency could characterize as aggravating or inconsistent with departmental standards.

The defense must also consider how statements made during the criminal case could affect an internal investigation. An explanation intended to resolve an employment problem can become evidence for the prosecutor, while silence or an incomplete response in an administrative proceeding can create separate employment concerns depending on the officer’s rights and obligations. Those proceedings should therefore be approached strategically rather than treated as unrelated.

If you are a police officer, sheriff’s deputy, state trooper, detective, corrections peace officer, or another law enforcement professional charged with DUI in Denver or the surrounding metropolitan area, call (303) 725-0017 or fill out a consultation form to schedule your free consultation today.

Overview of Law Enforcement Officers Charged with DUI in Denver, Colorado

Back to top

DUI Charges Against Law Enforcement Officers in Colorado

Colorado prosecutes DUI, DUI per se, and DWAI under C.R.S. § 42-4-1301. A person may be charged with DUI when alcohol, one or more drugs, or a combination of substances allegedly affects the person to the point that they are substantially incapable of exercising clear judgment, sufficient physical control, or due care in operating a vehicle. DUI per se generally applies when the driver has a BAC of at least 0.08 under the statutory framework, while DWAI requires impairment to the slightest degree.

Law enforcement officers are subject to the same criminal DUI statutes as other drivers. Their badge, POST certification, agency, rank, or years of service do not create a separate DUI offense or reduce the prosecution’s burden of proof.

However, the professional consequences can be very different. A misdemeanor DUI may trigger an internal investigation even if it occurred off duty and in a personal vehicle. A repeat DUI, crash, refusal, firearm-related circumstance, or attempt to interfere with the investigation can create substantially more serious employment concerns.

Denver Police Department’s current discipline handbook illustrates how differently agencies may view officer DUI. DPD states that driving offenses involving alcohol or intoxicants can support departmental rule violations and identifies prior DUI/DWAI history as especially significant in determining the conduct category for a new violation.

Back to top

Will a DUI Automatically Cause an Officer to Lose Colorado POST Certification?

Not necessarily. A misdemeanor DUI does not automatically appear to fall within the same mandatory POST revocation category as every felony or the specifically enumerated misdemeanors identified in Colorado’s POST certification law.

C.R.S. § 24-31-305 requires POST to suspend or revoke certification when a certificate holder has been convicted of a felony or certain specifically identified misdemeanors and in other circumstances established by statute. The law does not provide that every misdemeanor traffic conviction automatically results in POST decertification.

That distinction is important for a first misdemeanor DUI. An officer may face severe agency discipline without necessarily losing POST certification. Certification and employment are related but different. A department may suspend, demote, reassign, or terminate an officer under its own policies even when POST certification remains technically valid.

Felony DUI presents a much more serious issue. Because Colorado’s POST statute provides for suspension or revocation when a certificate holder has been convicted of a felony, a felony DUI conviction can directly threaten the certification required to continue working as a Colorado peace officer.

POST also maintains a statewide database containing certification, training, employment, and specified misconduct information. Colorado’s Attorney General has explained that the database can contain information about certification revocation, termination for cause, resignation or retirement during investigations, certain criminal investigations or charges, and credibility disclosures reported by prosecutors.

Back to top

Internal Affairs Investigations After an Officer DUI

A law enforcement officer may face an internal administrative investigation independent of the criminal prosecution.

The employing agency may examine whether the officer violated rules concerning obeying the law, conduct unbecoming, alcohol use, truthfulness, firearm possession, operation of agency vehicles, reporting requirements, cooperation with investigators, or any other policy implicated by the incident.

This investigation may begin well before the DUI case is completed. An officer can therefore face administrative leave or reassignment while still legally presumed innocent in criminal court.

The evidentiary standards and purposes are also different. Prosecutors must prove a criminal DUI beyond a reasonable doubt. A department deciding whether an internal policy was violated may operate under its own administrative standards and disciplinary procedures. An acquittal or dismissal can be extremely important, but it does not always guarantee that an agency will take no administrative action.

A coordinated defense should therefore examine both proceedings from the beginning.

Back to top

Statements to Internal Affairs and the Criminal Case

One of the most complicated issues for an officer charged with DUI is responding to employment-related questioning while a criminal prosecution remains pending.

An employing agency may require an officer to participate in an administrative investigation under circumstances where constitutional and employment protections concerning compelled statements become important. Statements compelled for administrative purposes can raise different issues from voluntary statements made to criminal investigators.

An officer should not assume that ordinary workplace questioning following a DUI is harmless simply because the interviewer is another law enforcement officer or supervisor. The distinction between a compelled administrative interview and a voluntary criminal statement can be critical.

Defense counsel should determine:

  • who is conducting the interview;
  • whether it is criminal or administrative;
  • whether the officer is being ordered to answer;
  • what departmental rights or collective bargaining protections apply;
  • whether the statements can be used criminally;
  • whether union or legal representation is available; and
  • whether a written statement could later be reviewed by prosecutors, POST, or another agency.

A poorly coordinated response can create problems in both proceedings.

Back to top

Denver Police Department Discipline for DUI or DWAI

Denver Police Department’s discipline handbook contains specific guidance concerning officer DUI and DWAI allegations.

DPD recognizes the inherent danger of DUI and DWAI and provides that where an officer has a prior DUI/DWAI conviction or a prior sustained DPD rule violation involving DUI or DWAI, a later DUI-related rule violation is treated as Conduct Category F, regardless of the category to which the violation might otherwise have been assigned.

The handbook also identifies circumstances that may aggravate discipline in an alcohol- or intoxicant-related driving case. These include:

  • driving that causes death or physical injury;
  • more than minimal property damage;
  • reckless driving or excessive speeding of at least 20 mph over the limit;
  • threatening, discourteous, abusive, disrespectful, or unprofessional conduct toward investigating officers;
  • attempting to elude apprehension;
  • resisting detention or arrest; and
  • carrying or displaying a firearm.

DPD also identifies a BAC below 0.08 as one factor that may be considered mitigating under its discipline framework. That does not prevent a DWAI charge or guarantee reduced discipline, but it shows that the exact circumstances of the DUI investigation can affect employment consequences independently from the criminal charge.

Officers employed by other agencies—including sheriff’s offices, suburban police departments, Colorado State Patrol, and specialized state or municipal agencies—may be governed by different disciplinary matrices, collective bargaining agreements, civil service rules, and internal policies.

Back to top

Carrying a Firearm During a DUI Arrest

Law enforcement officers often carry firearms while off duty, which can make an ordinary DUI arrest professionally more complicated.

The presence of a lawfully carried service or personal firearm does not automatically create a separate weapons crime. However, an employing agency may consider the possession of the firearm when evaluating judgment, safety, and compliance with departmental alcohol and weapons policies.

Denver Police Department specifically lists carrying a firearm on the officer’s person or displaying a firearm among factors that may aggravate discipline in alcohol- or intoxicant-related driving cases.

The circumstances matter. An unloaded weapon secured in a vehicle presents a different factual situation from an allegation that an intoxicated officer displayed or handled a firearm during the stop. The defense should prevent the agency or prosecution from treating all firearm-related circumstances as equivalent.

Back to top

DUI While Driving a Police Vehicle

A DUI involving an agency-owned vehicle can create much more serious employment consequences than an off-duty DUI in a personal vehicle.

The employing agency may investigate unauthorized use, misuse of government property, failure to follow fleet policies, conduct unbecoming, unsafe operation, or neglect of duty in addition to the alleged DUI itself.

If a collision damages the agency vehicle, the department may also examine financial loss and public-safety implications. Denver Police Department specifically identifies more than minimal property damage as an aggravating consideration in alcohol-related driving discipline.

An officer who was on duty or acting under color of authority at the time of the alleged DUI may face even greater scrutiny because the conduct has a direct relationship to official responsibilities.

Back to top

Attempting to Use Law Enforcement Status During a DUI Stop

A law enforcement officer may know the investigating officer, understand police procedures, or believe that professional courtesy will affect the encounter. Any allegation that the officer tried to interfere with the investigation, demand preferential treatment, intimidate another officer, or invoke rank or agency status can substantially worsen the professional consequences.

An agency may view such conduct separately from the DUI itself and investigate integrity, professionalism, or obedience-to-law issues.

Denver Police Department’s disciplinary guidance specifically identifies threatening, discourteous, abusive, disrespectful, or unprofessional behavior toward investigating officers as a potential aggravating factor. Attempts to elude apprehension and resisting detention or arrest are also specifically identified.

Body-camera and dash-camera footage can be particularly important in these situations because it provides objective evidence of what the officer actually said and did rather than relying solely on descriptions contained in an arrest report.

Back to top

Officer Credibility and Brady/Giglio Concerns

Law enforcement officers regularly testify in criminal cases, making credibility uniquely important to their employment.

A routine DUI conviction does not automatically mean an officer is dishonest or that every future prosecution involving the officer is compromised. However, a DUI investigation can become much more serious professionally if it includes allegations of dishonesty, false statements, evidence manipulation, attempts to influence investigating officers, or inaccurate internal reports.

Colorado POST’s public database framework includes certain credibility disclosure information reported by prosecutors that could affect an officer’s credibility as a witness in court. It also includes untruthfulness information and certain criminal-investigation and employment events.

For that reason, the defense should carefully separate the DUI allegation itself from accusations concerning truthfulness. A dispute about whether an officer was impaired is not automatically the same thing as a finding that the officer lied.

If prosecutors or the employing agency make an integrity allegation, that issue can become as professionally significant as the DUI because an officer whose testimony is repeatedly required in court may experience difficulties performing essential duties if prosecutors have credibility concerns.

Back to top

Can a Law Enforcement Agency Fire an Officer for DUI?

Potentially. POST certification and continued employment are not the same thing.

A department may impose discipline under its own policies, civil service rules, collective bargaining agreement, employment procedures, and applicable state or local law. Possible outcomes may include counseling, retraining, suspension, loss of specialty assignments, reassignment, demotion, last-chance agreements, termination, or other discipline depending on the agency and facts.

Factors that may increase the risk of termination include:

  • prior DUI or DWAI convictions;
  • a prior sustained departmental DUI violation;
  • felony DUI;
  • serious injury or death;
  • significant property damage;
  • excessive speeding or reckless driving;
  • attempting to flee or resist arrest;
  • dishonesty during the investigation;
  • inappropriate use of police authority;
  • firearm-related aggravating circumstances;
  • driving an agency vehicle;
  • a history of alcohol-related discipline; or
  • violation of an existing treatment or last-chance agreement.

A first off-duty misdemeanor DUI in a personal vehicle with no crash or other alleged misconduct may present a substantially different disciplinary situation from a repeat case involving additional aggravating circumstances.

Back to top

Resignation or Retirement During an Investigation

An officer considering resignation or retirement after a DUI should not assume that leaving the department necessarily prevents the matter from having future law enforcement consequences.

Colorado POST’s public database is required to include certain instances in which an officer resigns or retires while under investigation by the employing agency, district attorney, or attorney general. It can also include resignation or retirement followed by the opening of a qualifying investigation within six months.

That information can become important if the officer later seeks employment with another Colorado law enforcement agency. State law requires agencies hiring, appointing, or transferring someone into a position requiring POST certification to check the POST database before the hire, appointment, or transfer.

An officer should therefore evaluate the long-term implications before resigning solely in an attempt to avoid the current internal investigation.

Back to top

Repeat DUI and Felony DUI for Peace Officers

Repeat DUI creates both escalating criminal exposure and increasing professional risk. A second or third DUI may cause an agency to conclude that the case represents more than an isolated off-duty incident. Repeat offenses can also lead to mandatory jail, longer probation, treatment, sobriety monitoring, and additional DMV restrictions.

Colorado DUI, DUI per se, and DWAI can become a class 4 felony after the statutory number of qualifying prior convictions arising from separate criminal episodes. At that point, the professional stakes rise sharply.

Colorado law requires POST suspension or revocation in connection with felony convictions under C.R.S. § 24-31-305. Therefore, a felony DUI can threaten not only the officer’s current job but the state certification necessary for future peace officer employment.

An officer facing a possible felony DUI should therefore consider POST consequences before agreeing to any resolution that creates a felony conviction.

Back to top

Criminal Penalties for Law Enforcement Officers Charged With DUI

Law enforcement officers face the same statutory DUI sentencing ranges as other Colorado defendants. Their employment does not reduce or increase the basic statutory sentence, although the professional consequences can make even a misdemeanor conviction substantially more damaging.

First DUI or DUI Per Se — A first DUI or DUI per se generally carries 5 days to 1 year in county jail, a fine of $600 to $1,000, 48 to 96 hours of useful public service, and up to 2 years of probation. Alcohol or drug evaluation, treatment, monitoring, and DMV consequences may also apply.

First DUI With a BAC of 0.20 or Greater — When a qualifying first DUI or DUI per se involves a BAC of 0.20 or more, the minimum jail exposure generally increases to 10 days, with a maximum of 1 year. A very high BAC may also influence an employing agency’s view of the incident even when it does not alter POST certification by itself.

First DWAI — A first DWAI generally carries 2 days to 180 days in jail, a fine of $200 to $500, and 24 to 48 hours of useful public service.

Second DUI, DUI Per Se, or DWAI — A person with one qualifying prior generally faces 10 consecutive days to 1 year in jail, a fine of $600 to $1,500, 48 to 120 hours of useful public service, and at least 2 years of probation.

Third DUI, DUI Per Se, or DWAI — A person with two qualifying priors generally faces 60 consecutive days to 1 year in jail, a fine of $600 to $1,500, 48 to 120 hours of useful public service, and at least 2 years of probation.

Felony DUI — DUI, DUI per se, or DWAI can become a class 4 felony after the statutory number of qualifying prior convictions. A class 4 felony generally carries 2 to 6 years in prison, a possible fine of $2,000 to $500,000, and 3 years of mandatory parole, subject to Colorado’s felony DUI sentencing provisions.

A felony DUI is particularly serious for an officer because Colorado POST certification law separately addresses felony convictions.

Back to top

Driver’s License Consequences for Law Enforcement Officers

Colorado DUI cases proceed along two separate paths: the criminal court process and the administrative DMV process. Colorado DMV specifically explains that these proceedings are independent and that the outcome of the criminal case does not automatically control the license case.

That distinction can be especially important for a police officer, deputy, or trooper because the ability to operate a vehicle is often an essential job function. A license revocation may prevent patrol work, emergency response, transport assignments, surveillance, or other duties even before the criminal case is completed.

Colorado DMV generally requires a hearing request:

  • within seven days of arrest when a breath test was given;
  • within seven days of arrest when blood or breath testing was refused; or
  • within seven days after receiving blood-test results in qualifying blood cases.

Missing that deadline can allow the administrative revocation to proceed without a contested hearing.

A BAC of 0.15 results in Persistent Drunk Driver designation, and refusal of a chemical test also results in that designation. Reinstatement requirements may include ignition interlock, SR-22 insurance, fees, and alcohol education or therapy.

Back to top

DUI Test Refusal by a Law Enforcement Officer

An officer accused of refusing chemical testing can face the same DMV consequences as any other Colorado driver, but the professional perception of the refusal may create an additional problem.

A first qualifying refusal generally results in a one-year revocation and Persistent Drunk Driver designation. Colorado DMV also requires a restricted ignition-interlock license for a minimum period after restoration in qualifying refusal cases.

An employing agency may separately examine whether the officer’s conduct reflected intentional noncooperation with another law enforcement officer. However, not every failed test is a deliberate refusal.

A refusal may be challenged where the officer:

  • attempted to cooperate;
  • could not provide an adequate breath sample;
  • had a medical limitation;
  • was injured;
  • misunderstood the instructions;
  • requested clarification;
  • was declared a refusal prematurely; or
  • was not given a meaningful opportunity to complete the requested testing.
  • Body-camera footage can be critical because an agency may later review the same interaction when deciding whether the officer violated departmental professionalism or cooperation requirements.

Back to top

Defenses for Colorado Law Enforcement Officers Charged With DUI

The Traffic Stop Was Unlawful — A peace officer has the same constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures as any other defendant. Law enforcement generally must have reasonable suspicion for the stop and probable cause for the DUI arrest. If those standards were not met, defense counsel may seek suppression of evidence.

The Officer Was Not Actually Impaired — Fatigue, stress, illness, long shifts, sleep deprivation, injuries, and medical conditions can produce symptoms officers associate with intoxication. Law enforcement personnel frequently work overnight schedules, extended shifts, court appearances, emergency callouts, and secondary employment, making fatigue a particularly important alternative explanation in some cases.

Field Sobriety Testing Was Unreliable — Footwear, duty-related injuries, orthopedic problems, uneven pavement, poor lighting, weather, fatigue, and nervousness can all influence roadside testing. The arrest report should be compared carefully with body-camera footage.

The Breath Test Was Unreliable — Breath evidence can be challenged based on calibration, maintenance, operator technique, observation requirements, mouth alcohol, timing, and other procedural or scientific issues.

The Blood Test Was Flawed — Blood evidence may involve collection, preservation, storage, chain of custody, laboratory methodology, contamination, or interpretation problems. The defense should obtain the underlying laboratory file rather than relying only on the reported BAC.

The BAC Was Rising — If alcohol was consumed shortly before driving, the later test result may have been higher than the alcohol concentration at the actual time of operation.

Prescription Medication Did Not Cause Impairment — Officers can be charged with drug DUI based on lawfully prescribed medication, but the state still must prove impairment. Therapeutic use, tolerance, dosage, timing, and medical history may all matter.

The Refusal Allegation Was Incorrect — The officer may have been attempting to comply, physically unable to complete testing, or confused by instructions. A disputed refusal should be examined independently rather than automatically accepted because it appears in another officer’s report.

Departmental Aggravating Circumstances Did Not Occur — An agency may allege reckless driving, disrespectful behavior, firearm misuse, resistance, or attempts to obtain preferential treatment. Body-camera and dash-camera evidence may contradict or significantly narrow those allegations.

The Officer Did Not Engage in Dishonesty — An inaccurate recollection, disputed impairment opinion, or exercise of constitutional rights should not automatically become an integrity allegation. Because credibility findings can have serious career consequences, any accusation of dishonesty should be challenged separately and carefully.

Back to top

Role of a Colorado DUI Attorney When the Client Is a Law Enforcement Officer

Defending the Criminal Case With the Officer’s Career in Mind — A proposed plea should be evaluated not only for jail and fines but also for POST implications, departmental policy, internal affairs consequences, firearm restrictions, driving requirements, future law enforcement employment, and credibility concerns.

Coordinating the Criminal and Administrative Investigations — The officer may be contacted by criminal investigators, internal affairs, supervisors, civil service representatives, prosecutors, or POST. Statements in one proceeding can affect another. Defense counsel should identify the purpose and legal status of each interview before the officer responds.

Reviewing POST Certification Consequences — A first misdemeanor DUI and a felony DUI can present very different POST issues. Counsel should determine whether a proposed disposition falls within the certification provisions of C.R.S. § 24-31-305 rather than assuming all DUI convictions have the same result.

Reviewing Departmental Discipline Rules — Every agency may have different policies. For a Denver police officer, the DPD discipline handbook specifically addresses DUI/DWAI and identifies several aggravating factors. Officers working for other departments may be governed by separate disciplinary matrices, sheriff’s office policies, civil service rules, or collective bargaining agreements.

Protecting Against Unnecessary Credibility Findings — An officer DUI case should not unnecessarily evolve into an honesty case. Counsel should address inconsistencies carefully and distinguish disputed facts from intentional deception.

Challenging Chemical Testing and Roadside Evidence — Law enforcement training does not make the evidence immune from challenge. Breath machines can malfunction, blood evidence can be mishandled, roadside tests can be administered poorly, and arresting officers can draw incorrect conclusions.

Addressing the DMV Case Immediately — Loss of driving privileges can directly affect an officer’s ability to perform patrol or other driving-dependent duties. Colorado’s short DMV hearing deadlines make immediate action particularly important.

Preparing for Trial When Necessary — If prosecutors refuse an appropriate resolution, defense counsel can challenge the stop, field testing, chemical evidence, arresting officer testimony, alleged refusal, and every statutory element before a jury. The fact that the defendant is also a law enforcement officer does not reduce the prosecution’s burden.

Back to top

Key Issues in a Law Enforcement Officer DUI Case

A Colorado officer facing DUI may have several separate proceedings occurring at the same time.

The criminal court determines whether the state can prove DUI, DUI per se, or DWAI beyond a reasonable doubt. The DMV independently determines driver’s license consequences. The employing department may conduct an internal administrative investigation. POST may have certification or database-related responsibilities depending on the outcome and nature of the case.

Those proceedings should not be treated as interchangeable.

A DMV revocation does not automatically establish criminal guilt. A misdemeanor DUI conviction does not automatically equal POST decertification. An internal policy violation does not necessarily prove every element of DUI. Likewise, dismissal of the criminal case does not always prevent an agency from reviewing whether separate departmental rules were violated.

The defense should identify which issues belong in which proceeding and prevent allegations from being improperly carried from one process into another without the required proof.

Back to top

Frequently Asked Questions

Will I automatically lose my POST certification for a first DUI?
Not necessarily. Colorado’s POST statute mandates suspension or revocation for felony convictions and certain specified misdemeanors, but it does not state that every misdemeanor traffic DUI automatically requires decertification. Agency discipline remains a separate issue.

Can my department discipline me even if the DUI happened off duty?
Potentially. Departments commonly maintain conduct and obedience-to-law rules that can apply to off-duty behavior. The level of discipline depends on the agency’s policies and the facts.

Can Denver Police discipline an officer for DUI?
Yes. DPD’s discipline handbook specifically addresses DUI and DWAI and identifies prior offenses and several aggravating circumstances relevant to discipline.

Does having a firearm during the DUI automatically create another criminal charge?
Not necessarily. The circumstances determine whether a separate weapons offense exists. However, DPD specifically identifies carrying or displaying a firearm as a possible aggravating factor in its DUI/DWAI disciplinary analysis.

Can I be fired for a first misdemeanor DUI?
Potentially, depending on the department, employment status, disciplinary rules, and facts. A first off-duty DUI without other misconduct may be treated differently from a repeat DUI, crash, dishonesty allegation, firearm incident, or attempt to elude arrest.

What happens if I have a prior DUI?
The criminal penalties increase, and agency discipline may also become more serious. DPD specifically provides that a current DUI/DWAI violation involving an officer with a qualifying prior conviction or prior sustained DUI-related departmental violation is treated as Conduct Category F.

Can felony DUI cost me my POST certification?
Yes. Colorado law requires POST suspension or revocation in connection with felony convictions, making felony DUI substantially more serious for a peace officer than an ordinary misdemeanor DUI.

Can POST information affect a future law enforcement job?
Yes. Colorado maintains a POST database containing certification, employment, training, and specified misconduct information. Agencies hiring or transferring someone into a POST-certified position are required to review applicable database records.

Can resigning during the investigation keep it off my record?
Not necessarily. Colorado’s POST database can include certain resignations or retirements that occur while an officer is under investigation.

Can a DUI create Brady or Giglio concerns?
A DUI itself does not automatically establish dishonesty. However, if the incident includes a sustained finding of untruthfulness or another credibility-related issue, the consequences can become much more serious because prosecutors may have disclosure obligations and POST’s database includes certain credibility information.

Can I lose my driving privileges before the criminal case ends?
Yes. Colorado DMV’s administrative process is separate from criminal court, and hearing requests generally must be made within seven days in common breath-test, refusal, and blood-result situations.

What happens if I refuse a chemical test?
A qualifying refusal can result in license revocation and Persistent Drunk Driver designation. It may also become relevant in both the criminal case and an internal department investigation.

Can an officer get DUI for marijuana or prescription medication?
Yes. Colorado impaired-driving law applies to alcohol, cannabis, prescription drugs, illegal drugs, and combinations of substances. CDOT notes that officers throughout Colorado receive impaired-driving training and that many officers have advanced ARIDE or DRE training.

Back to top

Denver County Court Bond Information for Law Enforcement Officers Charged With DUI

A law enforcement officer arrested for misdemeanor DUI in Denver may have to address bond before the criminal case or employment investigation is resolved. Denver County Court currently publishes a Criminal Bond Schedule effective February 20, 2025.

DUI With No Prior DUI or DWAI — Denver County Court lists DUI with no prior DUI or DWAI convictions at a $1,500 personal recognizance bond. The officer’s employment does not create a separate bond amount under the published schedule.

DUI With a Prior DUI or DWAI — When the defendant has a prior DUI or DWAI, the schedule provides that bond is to be set by a judicial officer at the first appearance rather than under the automatic $1,500 PR bond.

DWAI With No Prior DUI or DWAI — A first qualifying DWAI is likewise listed at a $1,500 PR bond, while DWAI involving a prior DUI or DWAI requires the bond to be set by a judicial officer.

Monitored Sobriety for Repeat DUI Defendants — Denver County Court also states that under C.R.S. § 16-4-105(6)(a), a defendant with one or more qualifying prior DUI-related convictions must be ordered to monitored sobriety as a condition of bond. For a law enforcement officer, that condition may also affect scheduling, shift assignments, agency policy, or the employer’s assessment of fitness for duty while the case remains pending.

The published schedule governs qualifying pre-arraignment release and does not guarantee identical conditions in every case. Felony DUI, vehicular assault, vehicular homicide, child abuse, weapons allegations, or other accompanying offenses can result in a different bond process.

Back to top

Additional Resources

Colorado Peace Officer Standards and Training – Colorado Attorney General — Colorado POST is part of the Attorney General’s Criminal Justice Section and manages certification and training for active and reserve peace officers working for Colorado law enforcement agencies. Officers facing DUI can use POST resources to understand the distinction between state certification and agency employment and to review current certification requirements.

Colorado POST Public Database Information — The Attorney General explains the information maintained through Colorado’s POST transparency database, including certification revocations, specified employment actions, untruthfulness findings, certain criminal investigations, and prosecutor credibility disclosures. This can be particularly relevant to an officer considering resignation or applying to another agency after a DUI-related internal investigation.

Colorado Revised Statutes § 24-31-305 – POST Certification — This is the principal statute governing issuance, suspension, and revocation of Colorado peace officer certification. It is especially important in felony DUI cases because felony convictions fall within Colorado’s mandatory POST certification provisions.

Denver Police Department – Discipline Handbook — Denver Police Department’s discipline handbook contains specific guidance concerning officer DUI and DWAI. It addresses repeat DUI-related conduct and identifies potential aggravating factors including injury, property damage, excessive speeding, unprofessional conduct toward investigating officers, eluding, resisting arrest, and carrying or displaying a firearm.

Denver County Court – Criminal Division — Misdemeanor DUI and DWAI cases filed in Denver proceed through the criminal side of Denver County Court. An officer facing DUI in Denver can use this resource to understand the local court process while separately addressing the DMV and departmental proceedings.

Denver County Court – Traffic Division — Denver County Court’s Traffic Division handles ordinary traffic matters, while DUI cases proceed through the Criminal Division. This distinction is useful when the DUI stop also results in separate speeding, careless driving, lane, or other traffic citations.

Denver County Court – Bonding & Warrants — Denver County Court’s Criminal Bond Schedule is effective February 20, 2025. It lists a $1,500 PR bond for DUI and DWAI with no qualifying priors, requires judicial determination for repeat cases, and explains monitored sobriety as a condition of bond for defendants with qualifying prior impaired-driving convictions.

Colorado DMV – The DUI Process — Colorado DMV explains that a DUI creates two separate proceedings: the court case and the administrative driver’s license case. That distinction is especially important for an officer whose ability to drive may be an essential requirement of patrol or another assignment.

Colorado DMV – DUI Administrative Process — This official resource explains the seven-day hearing deadlines, license revocation, Persistent Drunk Driver designation, reinstatement, ignition interlock, SR-22 insurance, and alcohol education or therapy requirements. Officers who depend on a valid license for duty should address this process immediately rather than waiting for criminal court.

Colorado Department of Transportation – Impaired Driving — CDOT provides current data about impaired driving, statewide enforcement efforts, DUI laws, BAC information, ARIDE training, Drug Recognition Experts, and “The Heat Is On” enforcement periods. Its current materials report that Colorado uses specially trained officers and enhanced enforcement periods throughout the year.

CDOT – Drugged Driving Frequently Asked Questions — This page explains how officers identify suspected drug impairment and describes Colorado’s use of Drug Recognition Experts. It is useful when a law enforcement officer’s DUI allegation involves marijuana, prescription medication, another drug, or a combination of substances rather than alcohol alone.

No DUI Colorado — No DUI Colorado provides plain-language information about DUI court proceedings, DMV consequences, chemical-test refusal, treatment, ignition interlock, and drug-related driving. The resource can help an officer understand the administrative and treatment consequences that exist separately from departmental discipline.

National College for DUI Defense – Colorado DUI Laws — NCDD provides a defense-oriented overview of Colorado DUI, DWAI, testing, refusal, criminal penalties, and administrative consequences. It can be useful for identifying defense issues, although the current Colorado statutes, DMV guidance, and agency-specific policies control when determining the actual consequences.

Back to top

Finding a DUI Defense Attorney for Law Enforcement Officers in Denver

A DUI accusation can put a law enforcement career at risk in ways that do not apply to most defendants. The officer may be defending the criminal charge while simultaneously dealing with a DMV license action, internal affairs investigation, administrative leave, departmental discipline, POST issues, credibility concerns, loss of specialized duties, or questions about future employment.

Those proceedings require careful coordination. A misdemeanor DUI does not automatically equal POST decertification, and an arrest does not automatically prove an internal rule violation. At the same time, a felony conviction, repeat offense, dishonesty allegation, serious crash, firearm-related circumstance, or attempt to interfere with the investigation can substantially increase the professional consequences.

At the Law Office of Matthew A. Martin, P.C., we defend law enforcement officers and other professionals facing DUI, DWAI, high BAC DUI, drug DUI, prescription drug DUI, refusal, repeat DUI, and felony DUI allegations. We examine the criminal evidence while considering how the outcome may affect employment, POST certification, driving privileges, and the officer’s ability to continue working in law enforcement.

The Law Office of Matthew A. Martin, P.C. represents clients throughout Denver and the surrounding metropolitan area, including Aurora, Lakewood, Westminster, Thornton, Englewood, Arvada, Boulder, Parker, and Castle Rock.

If you are a law enforcement officer charged with DUI in Denver or Colorado, call (303) 725-0017 today or fill out a consultation form to schedule your free consultation.

Avvo Rating
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Colorado Criminal Defense Bar
National College for DUI Defense
Better Business Bureau