Elder Abuse in Colorado

Elder abuse in Colorado is a serious criminal allegation that can arise from claims of physical abuse, neglect, financial exploitation, theft, abandonment, unreasonable confinement, sexual abuse, or conduct that places an older adult’s physical or mental welfare at risk. These cases often involve family members, caregivers, nursing-home staff, home-health workers, fiduciaries, neighbors, financial agents, or professionals accused of mistreating or exploiting an older person. Because Colorado law gives special protection to at-risk elders and other at-risk adults, conduct that might be charged less severely in another context can become far more serious when the alleged victim is an older or vulnerable person.

Colorado’s crimes against at-risk persons statute is C.R.S. § 18-6.5-103. Under Colorado law, an “at-risk elder” means any person who is 70 years of age or older. The statute also protects at-risk adults with disabilities, at-risk adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and at-risk juveniles. In elder-abuse cases, prosecutors often focus not only on what allegedly happened, but also on the alleged victim’s age, vulnerability, dependence on the accused person, financial condition, medical condition, and relationship to the defendant.

Elder abuse cases can be legally and emotionally complex. A criminal allegation may begin with a report from Adult Protective Services, a hospital, a bank, a long-term care facility, a family member, a mandatory reporter, or law enforcement. The accusation may arise from a genuine concern, but it may also come from family conflict, inheritance disputes, caregiver burnout, misunderstanding of medical decisions, confusion over powers of attorney, or disagreement about how an older person’s money or care should be handled. Because these allegations can lead to felony charges, jail or prison exposure, restitution, protective orders, employment consequences, professional-license issues, and lasting reputational harm, early defense intervention is critical.

Colorado Elder Abuse Defense Attorney

Elder abuse allegations can move quickly from a family dispute or care concern into a criminal investigation. A person accused of elder abuse may suddenly face police questioning, APS involvement, subpoenas for financial records, interviews with medical providers, protective orders, removal from a home, loss of contact with a loved one, or arrest. In many cases, investigators may form early assumptions based on incomplete information, emotional accusations, or one-sided family narratives.

At the Law Office of Matthew A. Martin, P.C., we understand that elder abuse cases require careful investigation, not snap judgments. Matthew Martin examines the alleged victim’s age and condition, the defendant’s relationship to the alleged victim, medical records, care plans, financial documents, powers of attorney, bank records, text messages, witness statements, APS reports, police reports, and whether the prosecution can prove the required mental state. We fight to ensure our clients are not convicted based on misunderstanding, family conflict, caregiver exhaustion, financial confusion, or unsupported allegations.

If you or someone you love has been charged with elder abuse or a crime against an at-risk elder in Colorado, call (303) 725-0017 to schedule your free consultation today.

Overview of Elder Abuse and Crimes Against At-Risk Persons in Colorado

Back to top

Definition of Elder Abuse Under Colorado Law

Colorado does not use one single criminal charge for every form of elder abuse. Instead, elder abuse cases are generally prosecuted under the broader crimes against at-risk persons statutes found in C.R.S. § 18-6.5-102 and C.R.S. § 18-6.5-103. These statutes define protected categories of at-risk people and classify certain crimes more severely when the alleged victim is an at-risk elder or other at-risk person.

Under C.R.S. § 18-6.5-102, abuse includes the nonaccidental infliction of bodily injury, serious bodily injury, or death; confinement or restraint that is unreasonable under generally accepted caretaking standards; or subjection to sexual conduct or contact that is classified as a crime under Colorado law. The statute also defines caretaker neglect, exploitation, position of trust, undue influence, and other terms that often become central in elder abuse cases.

C.R.S. § 18-6.5-103 then sets out the criminal classifications for crimes against at-risk persons. Depending on the facts, elder abuse allegations may involve criminal negligence, assault, robbery, theft, caretaker neglect, unlawful abandonment, sexual offenses, criminal exploitation, or false imprisonment. This means the exact charge, penalty range, and defense strategy depend heavily on the specific conduct alleged.

Back to top

Who Counts as an At-Risk Elder in Colorado

Under Colorado law, an at-risk elder is any person who is 70 years of age or older. The prosecution does not necessarily have to prove that the person was medically incapacitated, financially dependent, or physically helpless if the case is based on age alone. The person’s age can be enough to place them within the protected at-risk elder category.

Colorado law also protects at-risk adults, which includes people who are 70 or older and adults with qualifying disabilities. In addition, Colorado law separately addresses at-risk adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Because these categories can overlap, prosecutors may use the broader term “at-risk person” when charging or describing the case.

In many cases, the defense must carefully evaluate whether the prosecution can prove the alleged victim’s protected status at the relevant time. Age, disability status, medical condition, dependence, and the accused person’s knowledge of the alleged victim’s status may all become important depending on the specific charge.

Back to top

Common Situations Leading to Elder Abuse Charges

Family Caregiving Disputes — Many elder abuse allegations arise within families. Adult children, spouses, grandchildren, siblings, or other relatives may be accused of neglecting care, misusing money, isolating an older family member, or making decisions that other relatives believe are harmful. These cases may be emotionally charged because they often overlap with inheritance disputes, end-of-life decisions, caregiving stress, and longstanding family conflict.

Nursing Home or Facility Allegations — Staff members at nursing homes, assisted-living facilities, rehabilitation centers, hospitals, and care homes may be accused of neglect, assault, improper restraint, medication-related misconduct, or failure to provide adequate care. These cases may involve facility policies, staffing levels, medical records, shift notes, witness statements, and questions about whether the accused individual personally caused the alleged harm.

Home Health and Professional Caregiver Cases — Home-health aides, visiting nurses, personal care attendants, and paid caregivers may face allegations involving neglect, financial exploitation, rough handling, medication issues, or failure to follow a care plan. The defense may need to examine employment records, care instructions, agency policies, family communications, and whether the alleged conduct was caused by the accused person or by broader care-system problems.

Financial Exploitation Allegations — Elder abuse charges frequently involve claims that someone took money, used undue influence, misused a power of attorney, changed accounts, obtained gifts, used debit cards, transferred property, or pressured an older person into financial decisions. These cases often turn on consent, documentation, authority, capacity, relationship history, and whether the transaction was actually deceptive or exploitative.

Medical Neglect or Care Decisions — A person may be accused of neglecting an at-risk elder by failing to provide food, shelter, medical care, medication, supervision, hygiene, or other necessary care. But not every poor outcome is criminal neglect. The defense may examine medical directives, palliative care plans, hospice decisions, provider instructions, the elder’s own choices, available resources, and whether the accused person had a legal or assumed duty of care.

Allegations of Isolation or Confinement — Some cases involve claims that an older person was kept away from family, confined in a room, locked inside a home, physically restrained, or prevented from leaving. These cases may raise difficult issues about dementia care, wandering risk, fall prevention, safety measures, and whether restrictions were unreasonable or necessary under the circumstances.

Adult Protective Services Investigations — A criminal case may begin after APS receives a report of suspected mistreatment. APS involvement does not automatically mean a crime occurred, but APS records, interviews, and referrals to law enforcement can become important evidence. A person contacted by APS or police should be careful about making statements before understanding the criminal risk.

Back to top

Physical Abuse and Criminal Negligence Against an At-Risk Elder

Physical elder abuse allegations may involve claims that the accused person caused bodily injury, serious bodily injury, or death to an at-risk elder. Depending on the facts, prosecutors may charge assault, criminal negligence against an at-risk person, or another offense enhanced by the alleged victim’s at-risk status.

Under C.R.S. § 18-6.5-103, criminal negligence resulting in death to an at-risk person is a class 4 felony. Criminal negligence resulting in serious bodily injury to an at-risk person is a class 5 felony. Criminal negligence resulting in bodily injury to an at-risk person is a class 6 felony. These charges can arise from falls, medication mistakes, unsafe supervision, failure to seek medical care, dangerous living conditions, transportation incidents, or other alleged failures that prosecutors believe created an unjustifiable risk.

Assault allegations involving an at-risk person can also be punished more severely. First-degree assault, second-degree assault, and third-degree assault against an at-risk person carry specific felony classifications under C.R.S. § 18-6.5-103. The defense must examine whether the alleged injury was accidental, whether the accused caused it, whether the medical evidence supports the allegation, whether the alleged victim had preexisting conditions, and whether the prosecution can prove the required mental state.

Back to top

Caretaker Neglect and Unlawful Abandonment

Caretaker neglect is one of the most common forms of alleged elder abuse in Colorado. Under Colorado law, a caretaker includes a person responsible for the care of an at-risk person because of a family or legal relationship, a person who has assumed responsibility for care, or a person who is paid to provide care or services. Caretaker neglect can involve failure to provide or secure adequate food, clothing, shelter, psychological care, physical care, medical care, supervision, or other treatment necessary for health or safety.

A person commits a class 1 misdemeanor if they knowingly commit caretaker neglect against an at-risk person or knowingly act in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical or mental welfare of an at-risk person. A person who unlawfully abandons an at-risk person also commits a class 1 misdemeanor.

These cases often turn on the meaning of “knowingly.” A bad outcome, difficult caregiving situation, lack of resources, medical decline, or mistake does not automatically prove criminal neglect. The defense may examine whether the accused person actually had a duty of care, whether the elder refused help, whether medical providers were involved, whether the accused person followed care instructions, whether the necessary services were available, and whether another person or agency was responsible.

Colorado law also recognizes that withholding, withdrawing, or refusing certain medical treatment in accordance with a valid medical directive, medical order, or palliative plan of care is not caretaker neglect. This can be important in cases involving hospice care, end-of-life treatment, CPR directives, medical powers of attorney, MOST forms, and other documented care decisions.

Back to top

Financial Exploitation and Theft from an At-Risk Elder

Financial exploitation is one of the most aggressively prosecuted forms of elder abuse. Under C.R.S. § 18-6.5-103, a person commits criminal exploitation of an at-risk person when they knowingly use deception, harassment, intimidation, or undue influence to permanently or temporarily deprive an at-risk person of the use, benefit, or possession of something of value.

Criminal exploitation of an at-risk person is a class 3 felony if the value of the thing involved is $500 or more. It is a class 5 felony if the value is less than $500. Theft involving an at-risk person can also be punished severely. Theft against an at-risk person may be charged as a class 5 felony if the value is less than $500 and a class 3 felony if the value is $500 or more. Theft from the person of an at-risk person by means other than force, threat, or intimidation is a class 4 felony regardless of value.

Financial exploitation cases can involve powers of attorney, joint bank accounts, cash withdrawals, gifts, loans, property transfers, caregiver payments, debit card use, real estate transactions, changes to wills or beneficiaries, unpaid bills, or family disputes over inheritance. The defense may focus on authorization, consent, capacity, accounting records, prior course of dealing, compensation for caregiving, lack of deception, lack of undue influence, and whether the accused person actually deprived the elder of anything of value.

Back to top

False Imprisonment and Unreasonable Restraint

Elder abuse allegations may involve claims that an at-risk elder was confined, restrained, isolated, locked in a room, prevented from leaving, or physically restricted. Colorado law recognizes false imprisonment of an at-risk person in several forms, including certain locked or barricaded confinement, tying, caging, chaining, or similar physical restraints, or confinement by force, threats, or intimidation designed to restrict freedom of movement.

These cases can be especially difficult in dementia, Alzheimer’s, developmental disability, fall-risk, wandering-risk, or facility-care situations. Caregivers may take steps they believe are necessary to prevent injury, wandering, falls, self-harm, medication errors, or unsafe contact with others. Prosecutors may interpret those same actions as unreasonable confinement or restraint.

Colorado law provides an affirmative defense in certain restraint-related cases for a person with responsibility for care or supervision when the conduct was reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances and reasonably necessary to promote the safety and welfare of the at-risk person. A defense attorney must carefully examine the care setting, medical condition, safety risks, available alternatives, facility policies, and whether the alleged restraint was actually unreasonable.

Back to top

Sexual Abuse Allegations Involving At-Risk Elders

Sexual abuse allegations involving at-risk elders are among the most serious cases prosecuted under Colorado’s at-risk-person laws. If the alleged victim is an at-risk person, sexual assault and unlawful sexual contact offenses can carry enhanced felony classifications. Under C.R.S. § 18-6.5-103, sexual assault against an at-risk person is treated as a class 2 felony, while unlawful sexual contact against an at-risk person can be a felony and may be elevated further depending on the facts.

These cases may involve allegations against caregivers, facility staff, family members, medical providers, visitors, or other residents in a care setting. The defense must examine consent issues, capacity, identity, medical evidence, witness reliability, surveillance footage, facility records, prior statements, dementia-related memory issues, and whether the prosecution can prove the alleged conduct beyond a reasonable doubt.

Because allegations of sexual abuse against an elder can lead to prison exposure, sex offender registration, professional-license consequences, and severe public stigma, they require immediate and detailed defense work.

Back to top

Mandatory Reporting and Adult Protective Services Investigations

Many elder abuse investigations begin with a mandatory report. Colorado law requires certain professionals to report observed or known mistreatment of an at-risk elder or at-risk adult with an intellectual and developmental disability to law enforcement within 24 hours. Mandatory reporters may include healthcare providers, long-term care facility staff, first responders, law enforcement personnel, mental health professionals, social workers, home-health staff, and other professionals.

Once a report is made, Adult Protective Services and law enforcement may become involved. APS may interview the elder, family members, caregivers, facility staff, medical providers, and others. Police may collect records, seek warrants, interview witnesses, or request financial documents. A person accused of elder abuse may believe they are simply explaining a misunderstanding, but statements made during these early contacts can later be used in a criminal case.

Anyone contacted about suspected elder abuse should take the situation seriously. Even when the accusation seems exaggerated or false, the combination of APS involvement, mandatory reporting, medical records, and police investigation can quickly create criminal exposure.

Back to top

Penalties for Elder Abuse in Colorado

The penalties for elder abuse in Colorado depend on the specific offense charged, the alleged victim’s at-risk status, the value of any property involved, the degree of injury, and the defendant’s criminal history.

Criminal Negligence Causing Injury or Death — Criminal negligence resulting in death to an at-risk person is a class 4 felony. Criminal negligence resulting in serious bodily injury is a class 5 felony. Criminal negligence resulting in bodily injury is a class 6 felony.

Assault Against an At-Risk Elder — Assault offenses against an at-risk person may be elevated under C.R.S. § 18-6.5-103. Depending on the degree of assault and the circumstances, the offense may be charged as a felony with serious prison exposure.

Caretaker Neglect and Unlawful Abandonment — Knowingly committing caretaker neglect, knowingly acting in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical or mental welfare of an at-risk person, or unlawfully abandoning an at-risk person is generally a class 1 misdemeanor.

Theft and Financial Exploitation — Theft against an at-risk person may be a class 5 felony if the value is less than $500 and a class 3 felony if the value is $500 or more. Criminal exploitation of an at-risk person is a class 5 felony if the value is less than $500 and a class 3 felony if the value is $500 or more.

Robbery Against an At-Risk Elder — Robbery against an at-risk person is a class 3 felony and carries mandatory prison sentencing consequences under the statute.

Sexual Offenses Against an At-Risk Elder — Sexual assault and unlawful sexual contact involving at-risk persons can carry enhanced felony classifications, sex offense treatment requirements, sex offender registration, and severe prison exposure.

False Imprisonment of an At-Risk Person — False imprisonment of an at-risk person may be charged as a class 6 felony or class 1 misdemeanor depending on the form of confinement or restraint alleged.

Back to top

Collateral Consequences of an Elder Abuse Conviction

An elder abuse conviction can create consequences far beyond the criminal sentence. A conviction may affect employment, housing, professional licensing, immigration status, security clearances, firearm rights, family relationships, inheritance disputes, guardianship proceedings, conservatorship proceedings, and the ability to work with vulnerable populations.

For caregivers and healthcare workers, the consequences can be especially severe. A conviction or even a substantiated allegation may affect employment in nursing homes, hospitals, home-health agencies, assisted-living facilities, rehabilitation centers, disability services, mental health settings, and other care environments. Professional licensing boards may review the case and impose discipline, monitoring, suspension, or revocation.

Financial exploitation convictions can also lead to restitution, civil lawsuits, probate litigation, removal as power of attorney, loss of fiduciary roles, and long-term damage to a person’s reputation within a family or community. Because elder abuse allegations often overlap with family disputes, a criminal case can also affect visitation, caregiving authority, estate planning, and access to the alleged victim.

Back to top

Defenses to Elder Abuse Charges

No At-Risk Status — The prosecution must prove that the alleged victim qualified as an at-risk elder, at-risk adult, or other protected person under Colorado law. In some cases, age or disability status may be disputed or may not match the charged theory.

No Required Mental State — Many elder abuse charges require proof that the defendant acted knowingly, intentionally, or with criminal negligence. A bad outcome, mistake, accident, poor judgment, or difficult caregiving situation does not automatically prove the required mental state.

No Duty of Care — Caretaker neglect cases often depend on whether the accused person was legally or practically responsible for the elder’s care. If the accused person was not a caretaker, had not assumed responsibility, or was not responsible for the specific care at issue, the prosecution may have difficulty proving neglect.

Accident or Medical Condition Caused the Injury — Older adults may suffer bruises, falls, fractures, confusion, medication reactions, infections, pressure sores, or decline for reasons unrelated to abuse. Medical records, expert review, preexisting conditions, and alternative explanations may be critical.

Valid Medical Directive or End-of-Life Care Decision — Colorado law recognizes that withholding, withdrawing, or refusing certain treatment under a valid medical directive, medical order, or palliative plan of care is not caretaker neglect. This can be a key defense in hospice, end-of-life, CPR-directive, MOST-form, or medical-power-of-attorney cases.

Consent or Authorization in Financial Cases — Financial exploitation allegations may be defended by showing that the elder authorized the transaction, gave a gift, agreed to compensate the caregiver, shared an account, signed a valid power of attorney, or had a longstanding financial arrangement with the accused person.

No Deception, Harassment, Intimidation, or Undue Influence — Criminal exploitation requires proof of wrongful means such as deception, harassment, intimidation, or undue influence. Family conflict or financial disagreement is not enough by itself.

Mistaken Identity or False Accusation — In facilities, shared homes, or family settings, multiple people may have access to the elder, finances, medication, or living space. The defense may challenge whether the accused person was actually responsible for the alleged harm.

Insufficient Evidence — Elder abuse cases may rely on hearsay, incomplete medical records, assumptions by mandatory reporters, family accusations, or statements from witnesses with memory impairments. The prosecution must still prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt.

Illegal Search, Seizure, or Interrogation — Police may obtain bank records, phones, computers, medical documents, home evidence, or statements during elder abuse investigations. If law enforcement violated constitutional rights, the defense may seek suppression of unlawfully obtained evidence.

Back to top

Role of a Colorado Criminal Defense Attorney

Investigating the Full Context — Elder abuse cases cannot be understood from a police summary alone. A defense attorney reviews family history, care responsibilities, medical conditions, financial arrangements, powers of attorney, facility records, text messages, emails, bank documents, and the timeline leading to the allegation.

Challenging Assumptions About Caregiving — Caregiving for an elderly person can be difficult, exhausting, and medically complicated. A defense attorney works to distinguish criminal neglect from resource limitations, medical decline, miscommunication, family disagreement, or an elder’s own choices.

Reviewing Medical Evidence — Physical abuse and neglect allegations often depend on medical records. The defense may examine injuries, diagnoses, medication issues, fall history, infection risk, pressure injuries, cognitive conditions, and whether the medical evidence actually supports the prosecution’s theory.

Analyzing Financial Records — Financial exploitation cases require detailed review of bank records, transfers, account authority, gifts, receipts, loans, caregiving payments, property documents, and estate planning records. A defense attorney looks for lawful authority and innocent explanations.

Addressing APS and Parallel Proceedings — Elder abuse cases may involve APS, criminal court, probate court, guardianship disputes, conservatorship disputes, licensing boards, or civil litigation. Defense counsel must consider how statements and strategy in one setting may affect another.

Negotiating Reduced or Alternative Outcomes — In some cases, dismissal may be appropriate because the evidence is weak. In others, the defense may seek reduced charges, restitution-based resolutions, deferred outcomes, treatment-focused conditions, or agreements that minimize long-term harm.

Trial Representation — If the case proceeds to trial, the defense attorney challenges the state’s evidence, cross-examines investigators and witnesses, explains the medical or financial context, contests intent, and emphasizes the prosecution’s burden of proof. A strong defense prevents emotion and sympathy from replacing evidence.

Back to top

Key Elements the Prosecution Must Prove

The elements the prosecution must prove depend on the specific elder abuse theory charged. In general, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:

  • the alleged victim was an at-risk elder, at-risk adult, or other at-risk person under Colorado law;
  • the defendant committed the specific criminal act charged;
  • the defendant acted with the required mental state, such as knowingly, intentionally, or with criminal negligence;
  • the defendant’s conduct caused the injury, loss, confinement, neglect, exploitation, or other harm alleged; and
  • the conduct occurred in Colorado at or about the date and place charged.

In financial exploitation cases, the prosecution may also need to prove that the defendant knowingly used deception, harassment, intimidation, or undue influence to deprive the at-risk person of the use, benefit, or possession of something of value.

In caretaker neglect cases, the prosecution may need to prove that the defendant was a caretaker or otherwise knowingly acted in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical or mental welfare of the at-risk person.

If the prosecution fails to prove any required element of the specific charge, the defendant cannot be convicted of that offense.

Back to top

Frequently Asked Questions

What age counts as an elder under Colorado’s at-risk-person laws?
An at-risk elder is any person who is 70 years of age or older.

Is elder abuse always a felony in Colorado?
No. Some elder abuse-related offenses are misdemeanors, while others are felonies. The classification depends on the alleged conduct, injury, value of property involved, and specific statute charged.

Can a family member be charged with elder abuse?
Yes. Family members are often accused in elder abuse cases, especially when they provide care, manage money, live with the elder, or hold a power of attorney.

Can a caregiver be charged for neglect even if they did not intend harm?
Potentially yes, depending on the facts and mental state alleged. However, a poor outcome or caregiving mistake does not automatically prove criminal neglect. The prosecution must prove the required elements.

What is criminal exploitation of an at-risk elder?
Criminal exploitation generally involves knowingly using deception, harassment, intimidation, or undue influence to deprive an at-risk person of the use, benefit, or possession of something of value.

What if the elder gave me permission to use their money?
Consent, authorization, gifts, shared accounts, powers of attorney, and prior financial arrangements can be important defense issues. The defense may focus on whether the transaction was actually authorized and whether the prosecution can prove exploitation.

Can Adult Protective Services start a criminal case?
APS does not prosecute criminal cases, but APS reports and investigations can lead to law enforcement involvement and criminal charges.

Should I talk to APS or police if I am accused of elder abuse?
You should be very careful. Statements made to APS, police, facility investigators, or family members may later be used in a criminal case. It is best to speak with a defense attorney before making statements.

Can elder abuse charges affect a professional license?
Yes. Healthcare workers, caregivers, therapists, social workers, financial professionals, and other licensed professionals may face licensing consequences after an elder abuse allegation or conviction.

Can elder abuse charges be based on financial transactions instead of physical harm?
Yes. Colorado law includes theft and criminal exploitation of at-risk persons, which can involve money, property, benefits, services, accounts, or other things of value.

Back to top

Additional Resources

Colorado Revised Statutes § 18-6.5-102 – Definitions — This statute defines key terms used in Colorado crimes against at-risk persons cases, including abuse, at-risk elder, at-risk adult, caretaker, caretaker neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, position of trust, undue influence, and unlawful abandonment.

Colorado Revised Statutes § 18-6.5-103 – Crimes Against At-Risk Persons — This is the primary Colorado criminal statute classifying offenses against at-risk persons, including criminal negligence, assault, robbery, theft, caretaker neglect, unlawful abandonment, sexual offenses, criminal exploitation, and false imprisonment.

Colorado Department of Human Services – Mandatory Reporting of Adult Mistreatment — This state resource explains Colorado’s mandatory reporting rules for mistreatment of at-risk elders and at-risk adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Finding a Colorado Elder Abuse Defense Attorney

Elder abuse charges in Colorado can be deeply damaging and highly complex. These cases may involve medical records, family conflict, financial records, powers of attorney, caregiving decisions, APS investigations, mandatory reporting, facility policies, professional licensing issues, and felony exposure. They also involve emotionally sensitive allegations where sympathy for the alleged victim can sometimes overshadow the need for careful proof.

At the Law Office of Matthew A. Martin, P.C., we defend clients accused of elder abuse, crimes against at-risk persons, financial exploitation, caretaker neglect, assault, theft, and related offenses throughout Colorado. We investigate the facts, challenge unsupported assumptions, protect our clients’ rights, and fight to reduce the criminal and collateral consequences of these serious accusations.

If you are facing elder abuse charges in Colorado, call (303) 725-0017 today to schedule your free consultation.

Avvo Rating
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Colorado Criminal Defense Bar
National College for DUI Defense
Better Business Bureau